uni-leipzig-open-access/json/cog-2021-0114

{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,16]],"date-time":"2023-12-16T17:15:48Z","timestamp":1702746948627},"reference-count":61,"publisher":"Walter de Gruyter GmbH","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,1]],"date-time":"2023-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1682899200000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,25]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>This paper investigates three morphosyntactic alternations in Estonian \u2013 those between the exterior locative cases allative, adessive and ablative and the corresponding postpositions<jats:italic>peale<\/jats:italic>\u2018onto\u2019,<jats:italic>peal<\/jats:italic>\u2018on\u2019 and<jats:italic>pealt<\/jats:italic>\u2018off\u2019. Based on the Complexity Principle (e.g., Rohdenburg, G\u00fcnter. 2002. Processing complexity and the variable use of prepositions in English. In Hubert Cuyckens &amp; G\u00fcnter Radden (eds.),<jats:italic>Perspectives on prepositions<\/jats:italic>, 79\u2013100. T\u00fcbingen: Niemeyer), we expect cognitively more complex constructions to use more explicit (i.e., morphologically more substantial) marking by means of a postposition. Further, we expect variation to be conditioned similarly in all three semantic categories. For each of the three alternations, a random sample of the two outcomes (case vs. postposition) from the Estonian National Corpus is used, resulting in 3,000 data points. Using properties of the Landmark phrase as independent variables in Bayesian mixed-effects logistic regression models, we predict the choice of postpositions over case-marked realisations. Of the patterns found, only the frequency-related one supports our complexity-related hypothesis. We conclude that the Complexity Principle, in its general form, has little explanatory power for the Estonian constructions at hand and, in particular, that the derived principle of \u2018analytic support\u2019 is not generally applicable. We show, however, that the grammatical knowledge of Estonian exterior locative cases and the corresponding postpositions is regulated by our three factors in a relatively uniform way.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1515\/cog-2021-0114","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,7]],"date-time":"2023-07-07T12:51:00Z","timestamp":1688734260000},"page":"297-331","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["The complexity principle and the morphosyntactic alternation between case affixes and postpositions in Estonian"],"prefix":"10.1515","volume":"34","author":[{"given":"Jane","family":"Klavan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of English Studies , University of Tartu , Tartu , Estonia"}]},{"given":"Ole","family":"Sch\u00fctzler","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Geisteswissenschaftliches Zentrum, Universit\u00e4t Leipzig , Leipzig , Germany"}]}],"member":"374","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Anttila, Arto, Matthew Adams & Michael Speriosu. 2010. The role of prosody in the English dative alternation. Language and Cognitive Processes 25(7\u20139). 946\u2013981. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/01690960903525481.","DOI":"10.1080\/01690960903525481"},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Aristar, Anthony Rodrigues. 1997. Marking and hierarchy types and the grammaticalization of case-markers. Studies in Language 21(2). 313\u2013368. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1075\/sl.21.2.04ari.","DOI":"10.1075\/sl.21.2.04ari"},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Arnold, Jennifer E., Thomas Wasow, Anthony Losongco & Ryan Ginstrom. 2000. Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of complexity and information structure on constituent ordering. Language 76(1). 28\u201355. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/417392.","DOI":"10.1353\/lan.2000.0045"},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Barr, Dale J., Roger Levy, Christoph Scheepers & Harry J. Tily. 2013. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68(3). 255\u2013278. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jml.2012.11.001.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jml.2012.11.001"},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bresnan, Joan & Marilyn Ford. 2010. Predicting syntax: Processing dative constructions in American and Australian varieties of English. Language 86(1). 168\u2013213. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1353\/lan.0.0189.","DOI":"10.1353\/lan.0.0189"},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bresnan, Joan. 2007. Is syntactic knowledge probabilistic? Experiments with the English dative alternation. In Sam Featherston & Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds.), Roots: Linguistics in search of its evidential base, 75\u201396. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.","DOI":"10.1515\/9783110198621.75"},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_007","unstructured":"Bresnan, Joan, Anna Cueni, Tatiana Nikitina & R. Harald Baayen. 2007. Predicting the dative alternation. In Gerlof Bouma, Irene Kr\u00e4mer & Joost Zwarts (eds.), Cognitive foundations of interpretation, 69\u201394. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Science."},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_010","unstructured":"B\u00fcrkner, Paul-Christian. 2020. brms. Bayesian Regression Models using \u2018Stan\u2019. R-package version 2.12.0. Available at: https:\/\/cran.r-project.org\/web\/packages\/brms\/index.html."},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bybee, Joan L. 2013. Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of constructions. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar, 49\u201369. Oxford: Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordhb\/9780195396683.013.0004"},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Comrie, Bernard. 1986. Markedness, grammar, people, and the world. In Fred R. Eckman, Edith A. Moravcsik & Jessica R. Wirth (eds.), Markedness, 85\u2013106. New York: Plenum.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4757-5718-7_6"},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dahl, \u00d6sten. 2004. The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.","DOI":"10.1075\/slcs.71"},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Erelt, Mati. 2003. Syntax. In Mati Erelt (ed.), Estonian language, 93\u2013129. Tallinn: Estonian Academy Publishers.","DOI":"10.3176\/lu.2002.2.02"},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_015","unstructured":"Erelt, Mati, Reet Kasik, Helle Metslang, Henno Rajandi, Kristiina Ross, Henn Saari, Kaja Tael & Silvi Vare. 1995. Eesti keele grammatika I. Morfoloogia [The Grammar of Estonian I. Morphology]. Tallinn: Eesti Teaduste Akadeemia Eesti Keele Instituut."},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_016","unstructured":"Erelt, Mati, Tiiu Erelt & Kristiina Ross. 2007. Eesti keele k\u00e4siraamat [Handbook of Estonian]. Tallinn: Eesti Keele Sihtasutus."},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Futrell, Richard, Roger P. Levy & Edward Gibson. 2020. Dependency locality as an explanatory principle for word order. Language 96(2). 371\u2013412. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1353\/lan.2020.0024.","DOI":"10.1353\/lan.2020.0024"},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gibson, Edward. 2000. The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In Alec Marantz, Yasushi Miyashita & Wayne O\u2019Neil (eds.), Image, language, brain: Papers from the first mind articulation project symposium, 95\u2013126. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/3654.003.0008"},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Grafmiller, Jason, Benedikt Szmrecsanyi, Melanie R\u00f6thlisberger & Benedikt Heller. 2018. General introduction: A comparative perspective on probabilistic variation in grammar. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 3(1). 1\u201310. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5334\/gjgl.690.","DOI":"10.5334\/gjgl.690"},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hag\u00e8ge, Claude. 2010. Adpositions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199575008.001.0001"},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Haspelmath, Martin. 2006. Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics 42(1). 25\u201370. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0022226705003683.","DOI":"10.1017\/S0022226705003683"},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_022","unstructured":"Hawkins, John A. 1990. A parsing theory of word order universals. Linguistic Inquiry 21(2). 223\u2013261."},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hawkins, John A. 1992. Syntactic weight versus information structure in word order variation. Linguistische Berichte 4(Special issue). 196\u2013219.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-663-12176-3_7"},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hawkins, John A. 1994. A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511554285"},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hawkins, John A. 2004. Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199252695.001.0001"},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Heinze, Georg, Christine Wallisch & Daniela Dunkler. 2018. Variable selection \u2013 a review and recommendations for the practicing statistician. Biometrical Journal 60(3). 431\u2013449. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/bimj.201700067.","DOI":"10.1002\/bimj.201700067"},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_027","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Heller, Benedikt, Benedikt Szmrecsanyi & Jason Grafmiller. 2017. Stability and fluidity in syntactic variation world-wide: The genitive alternation across varieties of English. Journal of English Linguistics 45(1). 3\u201327. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0075424216685405.","DOI":"10.1177\/0075424216685405"},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_028","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hinrichs, Lars & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi. 2007. Recent changes in the function and frequency of Standard English genitive constructions: A multivariate analysis of tagged corpora. English Language and Linguistics 11(3). 437\u2013474. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s1360674307002341.","DOI":"10.1017\/S1360674307002341"},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_029","unstructured":"Kallas, Jelena & Kristina Koppel. 2018. Eesti keele \u00fchendkorpus 2017. [Estonian National Corpus 2017]. Tallinn: Center of Estonian Language Resources."},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_030","unstructured":"Klavan, Jane. 2012. Evidence in linguistics: Corpus-linguistic and experimental methods for studying grammatical synonymy. Tartu: University of Tartu Press Dissertationes Linguisticae Universitatis Tartuensis 15."},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_031","unstructured":"Klavan, Jane. 2020. Pitting corpus-based classification models against each other: A case study for predicting constructional choice in written Estonian. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 16(2). 363\u2013391."},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_032","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Klavan, Jane. 2023. Background Data for: The complexity principle and the morphosyntactic alternation between case affixes and postpositions in Estonian. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18710\/KDSZEP, DataverseNO, V1.","DOI":"10.1515\/cog-2021-0114"},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_033","unstructured":"Klavan, Jane, Maarja-Liisa Pilvik & Kristel Uiboaed. 2015. The use of multivariate statistical classification models for predicting constructional choice in spoken, nonstandard varieties of Estonian. SKY Journal of Linguistics 28. 187\u2013224."},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_034","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Klavan, Jane & Ann Veismann. 2017. Are corpus-based predictions mirrored in the preferential choices and ratings of native speakers? Predicting the alternation between the Estonian adessive case and the adposition peal \u2018on\u2019. Eesti ja soomeugri keeleteaduse ajakiri. Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics 8(2). 59\u201391. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.12697\/jeful.2017.8.2.03.","DOI":"10.12697\/jeful.2017.8.2.03"},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Klavan, Jane, Tanel Alum\u00e4e & Arvi Tavast. 2020. Eesti keele v\u00e4liskohak\u00e4\u00e4nete kasutus poolspontaanses k\u00f5nes automaatse transkriptsiooni p\u00f5hjal. [Analysis of Estonian external locative cases in semi-spontaneous speech using an automatic transcription system]. Keel ja Kirjandus 63(8\u20139). 757\u2013774. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.54013\/kk754a8.","DOI":"10.54013\/kk754a8"},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_036","unstructured":"Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press."},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_037","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive grammar. A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780195331967.001.0001"},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_038","unstructured":"Lestrade, Sander. 2010. The space of case. Nijmegen: Radboud University Dissertation."},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_039","unstructured":"Lindstr\u00f6m, Liina. 2005. Finiitverbi asend lauses. S\u00f5naj\u00e4rg ja seda m\u00f5jutavad tegurid suulises eesti keeles [The position of the finite verb in a clause: word order and the factors affecting it in Spoken Estonian]. Tartu: University of Tartu Press Dissertationes Filologiae Estonicae Universitatis Tartuensis 16."},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lohse, Barbara, John A. Hawkins & Thomas Wasow. 2004. Domain minimization in English verb-particle constructions. Language 80(2). 238\u2013261. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1353\/lan.2004.0089.","DOI":"10.1353\/lan.2004.0089"},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_041","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mithun, Marianne. 1987. Is basic word order universal? In Russell Tomlin (ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse, 281\u2013328. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.","DOI":"10.1075\/tsl.11.14mit"},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_042","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mondorf, Britta. 2009. More support for more-support: The role of processing constraints on the choice between synthetic and analytic comparative forms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.","DOI":"10.1075\/silv.4"},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_043","unstructured":"R Core Team. 2019. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Version 3.6.2. Available at: https:\/\/www.r-project.org\/."},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_044","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rohdenburg, G\u00fcnter. 1996. Cognitive complexity and increased grammatical explicitness in English. Cognitive Linguistics 7(2). 149\u2013182. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/cogl.1996.7.2.149.","DOI":"10.1515\/cogl.1996.7.2.149"},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rohdenburg, G\u00fcnter. 2002. Processing complexity and the variable use of prepositions in English. In Hubert Cuyckens & G\u00fcnter Radden (eds.), Perspectives on prepositions, 79\u2013100. T\u00fcbingen: Niemeyer.","DOI":"10.1515\/9783110924787.79"},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_046","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rohdenburg, G\u00fcnter. 2021. The Complexity Principle at work with rival prepositions. English Language and Linguistics 24(4). 769\u2013800. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s1360674319000327.","DOI":"10.1017\/S1360674319000327"},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_047","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rosenbach, Anette. 2005. Animacy versus weight as determinants of grammatical variation in English. Language 81(3). 613\u2013644. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1353\/lan.2005.0149.","DOI":"10.1353\/lan.2005.0149"},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_048","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rosenbach, Anette. 2014. English genitive variation\u2013the state of the art. English Language and Linguistics 18(2). 215\u2013262. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s1360674314000021.","DOI":"10.1017\/S1360674314000021"},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_049","unstructured":"RStudio Team. 2009\u20132019. RStudio: Integrated Development for R. Version 1.2.5033. Available at: http:\/\/www.rstudio.com\/."},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_050","unstructured":"Sarkar, Deepayan. 2018. lattice: Trellis Graphics for R. R-package version 0.20-38. Available at: https:\/\/cran.r-project.org\/web\/packages\/lattice\/index.html."},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_051","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sch\u00fctzler, Ole. 2018. Grammaticalization and information structure: Two perspectives on diachronic changes of notwithstanding in written American English. English Language and Linguistics 22(1). 101\u2013122. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s1360674316000411.","DOI":"10.1017\/S1360674316000411"},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_052","unstructured":"S\u00f6nning, Lukas. Forthcoming. Drawing on principles of perception: The line plot. In Lukas S\u00f6nning & Ole Sch\u00fctzler (eds.), Data visualization in corpus linguistics: Critical reflections and future directions. Helsinki: VARIENG."},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_053","unstructured":"Stan Development Team. 2019. Stan modeling language users guide and reference manual. version 2.26. Available at: http:\/\/mc-stan.org."},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_054","unstructured":"Sinclair, John. 1991. Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Talmy, Leonard. 1983. How languages structure space. In Herbert L. PickJr. & Linda P. Acredolo (eds.), Spatial orientation: Theory, research and application, 225\u2013282. New York: Plenum Press.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4615-9325-6_11"},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_056","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics, vol. 2. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/6847.001.0001"},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_057","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Temperley, David. 2007. Minimization of dependency length in written English. Cognition 105(2). 300\u2013333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cognition.2006.09.011.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cognition.2006.09.011"},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_058","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tiz\u00f3n-Couto, David & David Lorenz. 2021. Variables are valuable: Making a case for deductive modelling. Linguistics 59(5). 1279\u20131309. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/ling-2019-0050.","DOI":"10.1515\/ling-2019-0050"},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_059","unstructured":"Veismann, Ann & Mati Erelt. 2017. Kaass\u00f5nafraas. [Adpositional phrase. In Mati Erelt & Helle Metslang (eds.), Eesti keele s\u00fcntaks [Estonian Syntax], 446\u2013462. Tartu: Tartu \u00dclikooli kirjastus."},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wasow, Thomas & Jennifer Arnold. 2003. Post-verbal constituent ordering in English. In G\u00fcnter Rohdenburgand & Britta Mondorf (eds.), Determinants of grammatical variation in English, 119\u2013154. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.","DOI":"10.1515\/9783110900019.119"},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_061","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wasow, Thomas. 1997. Remarks on grammatical weight. Language Variation and Change 9(1). 81\u2013105. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0954394500001800.","DOI":"10.1017\/S0954394500001800"},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_062","unstructured":"Wasow, Thomas. 2002. Postverbal behaviour. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications."},{"key":"2023081011515709626_j_cog-2021-0114_ref_063","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wolk, Christoph, Joan Bresnan, Anette Rosenbach & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi. 2013. Dative and genitive variability in Late Modern English. Diachronica 30(3). 382\u2013419. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1075\/dia.30.3.04wol.","DOI":"10.1075\/dia.30.3.04wol"}],"container-title":["Cognitive Linguistics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyter.com\/document\/doi\/10.1515\/cog-2021-0114\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyter.com\/document\/doi\/10.1515\/cog-2021-0114\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,16]],"date-time":"2023-12-16T16:49:31Z","timestamp":1702745371000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyter.com\/document\/doi\/10.1515\/cog-2021-0114\/html"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,1]]},"references-count":61,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,21]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,25]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1515\/cog-2021-0114"],"URL":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1515\/cog-2021-0114","relation":{},"ISSN":["0936-5907","1613-3641"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0936-5907","type":"print"},{"value":"1613-3641","type":"electronic"}],"subject":["Linguistics and Language","Developmental and Educational Psychology","Language and Linguistics"],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,1]]}}}